Archive forDecember, 2010
In February 2007, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) stated in their Fourth Assessment Report that human actions are “very likely” (i.e. with 90% or greater probability) the cause of global warming, indicated by an increase of 0.75 degrees in average global temperatures over the last 100 years. This statement is the result of very tough discussions on a worldwide scale between thousands of climate researchers whether human activity is the main cause of global warming. The results of this discussion were presented to the public in many publications, for instance in Martin Durkin´s documentary “The Great Global Warming Swindle”, presented in March 2007 at UK´s Channel 4. The main message of this production was that man-made global warming is “a lie” and “the biggest scam of modern times.” Martin Durkin and coworkers argue that the scientific consensus on climate change is the product of “a multi billion-dollar worldwide industry, created by fanatically anti-industrial environmentalists, supported by scientists peddling scare stories to chase funding and propped up by complicit politicians and the media”. The documentary showcases scientists, politicians, economists, writers, and others who are skeptical of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic (or man-made) global warming. Some of the scientists, opposing the main stream of greenhouse gas theories, simply argue that it has not yet been ascertained whether humans are the primary cause of global warming or if there are other natural variations responsible for this phenomenon like increased solar activity, cosmic rays or variations in natural climatic cycles. There is also a series of scientists questioning the temperature records used in the databases as temperature differences attributed to the greenhouse effect are reasonable small (fractions of a ºC). The so-called “urban heat island” effect leads to a local warming in more populated areas, showing slightly higher temperatures due to to increased heat generated by cities, rather than a global temperature rise. Anyhow, this argument was confuted by the IPPC, indicating that the effect of the urban heat island on the global temperature trend is no more than 0.05 °C (0.09 °F) degrees through 1990.
Other facts presented by the film were shown to be incorrect or misinterpreted. The film asserts for instance that records of atmospheric CO2 levels since 1940 show a continuing increase, but during this period, global temperature decreased until 1975, and has increased since then. Anyhow, it is well recognized that this cooling was driven mostly by aerosols (i.e. pollution) in the atmosphere. There is nothing contradictory about this cooling when all sources of radiation changes are considered. A second argument that easily can be invalidated is the impact of the so-called “solar variation theory” on global warming. According to the authors, solar activity (and involving cosmic rays as well as heat from the sun aiding cloud formation) is currently at an extremely high level and directly linked to changes in global temperature. The film argues that solar activity is far more influential on global warming than any other anthropogenic or natural activity on Earth. What the film does not mention is that solar activity has declined over the last 30 years - at the same time as the major spike in global temperature.
But there are some statements related to the influence of the oceanic mass and water vapor on climate change which are more difficult to confute. Water vapor makes up about 98% of the greenhouse gases by volume and provides something between 40 to 80 percent of the natural greenhouse effect. It probably has the largest impact on the planet’s temperature and climatic conditions, much larger than CO2. Water particles in the form of clouds act to reflect incoming solar heat, but the film argues that the effects of clouds cannot be accurately simulated by scientists attempting to predict future weather patterns and their effects on global warming. This argument probably is correct and it is well recognized that water vapor is responsible for the natural warming up of the surface temperature to approximately 30-35ºC. Anthropogenic greenhouse effect, according to the film’s argumentation, is only about 2% of the total “natural” greenhouse effect, which corresponds to a 0.6-0.7 ºC increase in temperature. This estimate is somewhat smaller compared to the results of much more sophisticated simulations (0.9 - 2.7ºC), but there is undoubtedly an anthropogenic effect of CO2 increasing the average surface temperature.
One example of the complexity of climatic simulations is the prediction of future storm events considering global warming effects. According to a recently published study, published online by research meteorologist Tom Knutson in the journal Nature Geoscience and resumed in the New York Times (May 18, 2008), global warming isn’t to blame for the recent jump in hurricanes in the Atlantic. The study predicts that by the end of the century the number of hurricanes in the Atlantic will fall by 18 percent. In the past, Knutson has raised concerns about the effects of climate change on storms. His new paper has the potential to heat up a simmering debate among meteorologists about current and future effects of global warming in the Atlantic. And Knutson is not alone with this view. Another group of experts, those who study hurricanes and who are more often skeptical about global warming, also say there is no link between global warming and hurricane frequency. They attribute the recent increase to a natural multi-decade cycle. According to the prediction, the number of hurricanes touching land in the US and its neighbors will drop by about 30 percent because of wind factors. However, the biggest storms, those with winds of more than 110 mph, would only decrease in frequency by 8 percent. The biggest decrease is forecasted for storms with winds between 39 and 73 mph (normal tropical storms), who would decrease by 27 percent.
It’s not all good news from Knutson’s study, however. His computer model also forecasts that “hurricanes and tropical storms will be wetter and fiercer. Rainfall within 30 miles of a hurricane should jump by 37 percent and wind strength should increase by about 2 percent”, Knutson’s study says.
There are already critical reactions on this new publication. MIT hurricane meteorologist Kerry Emanuel claims that the computer model used by Knutson is not adequate enough to look at storms and according to Kevin Trenberth, a climate scientist from the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo., Knutson’s computer model is poor at assessing tropical weather and ”fail to replicate storms with any kind of fidelity.” It also does not considering well enough the intensity, duration and size of the storm events, as not only the number of hurricanes is important to evaluate.
Positive feedback comes from NOAA hurricane meteorologist Chris Landsea , who wasn’t part of this study, praised Knutson’s work as ”very consistent with what’s being said all along.” ”I think global warming is a big concern, but when it comes to hurricanes the evidence for changes is pretty darn tiny,” Landsea said.
About the Author
Dr. Oswald J. Eppers is manager of the consulting company E&R InterConsult and owner of the Two-Approach Job Assistant and Career Guide with daily updated job opportunities for renewable energy specialists
Article Source: EzineArticles.com
I feel really honoured to be nominated to take the group photo of our Manchester UK Flickr Group. Thanks all friends, for nominating me to take this picture……………I hope you like it.
Font bar,New Wakefield St, Manchester.
Note: I am putting up a medium resolution picture, all those friends who want to copy it, can do it by going to "All Sizes" above…………!!!
Explored……Front Page …..No.8 Now……..congrats Manchester UK Group……People can see you now………..LOL
Financial deals and allocation are some of the crucial matters that hold immense responsibility to manage and keep track on. Certain factors affect the funds allocation and management at different levels and diverse categories. Development of individual and business as well depends on various factors yet majorly on capital allocation and proper data retrieval of expenses. This all requirements gave birth to certified financial certificate.
Certified financial planner certification holds a very essential position in the development and other financial planner. Every kind of circle demands for the proper establishment and appropriate sourcing of financial issues. Certified financial planner is categorized as very powerful and responsible strata to move for career aspects and authorized financial certification.
Financial certificate indulges in depth knowledge and refined skills related to the financial plan for the clients keeping in mind target market. Financial planner certification provides diverse fields roles as planning for management of employees benefit, pension, property and tax planning, insurance plan and risk planning as well.
Latter on taking in torque it could be visualized that financial planner certification holds the below diverse management and plan sector:
- Investment purposes
- Regulations follow ups and other related issues
- As an financial advisory for the client
Benefits to get financial certificate are massive and could held the career to rich peak by holding an essential position as a financial planner and advisor for the client base and acquire best of earnings and progressive career. Some of such benefits are illustrated below:
Certified financial certificate is a guaranteed and reliable course to move ahead for as the holders receive the license to perform the financial planner certification practice as financial advisor.
Level 4 of Diploma in Financial involves the inherent part as financial protection unit that is considered as key factor to reduce later burden of course completion and provides a better norms to stand for pursuing and completion of certified financial certificate. It develops a deep sense of financial basic and facts with accredited trainings and well covered vast financial certificate. It creates the understanding of core sense of financial planner certification.
The exams are held on online basis that enables to attempt at the utmost preparation and reach to the exam with complete preparation and make a confident attempt with instant checked exam papers and results displayed there and then online.
The value is accredited as the degree holder of certified financial certificate that is rich career prospect in itself and generates vast opportunities to excel like an individual with a successful respective career ahead. It is pretty convenient to go for sale of mutual funds or sell certain policy while it is a tragic decision and risky also to indulge as a financial planner. Immense knowledge forecast ability and proper allocation and record maintenance is prior demand to move for this career.
Acquiring financial certificate beholds a great importance in terms of career and knowledge based education as well and it also opens wide prospects of dev elopement of opportunities in itself. Financial concerns are self awaking itself and nowadays crowd may it be an individual or business holder all seek for certified financial planner that increases the demand of the certified financial certificate.
For more information visit http://www.financialplannerprogram.com
Certified financial planning is categorized as very powerful and responsible strata to move for career aspects and authorized financial certification. There are some requirements which gave birth to certified financial planning certificate. Financialplannerprogram.com provides you the best courses of financial planning certificate.
Article Source: EzineArticles.com